MARKEDNESS AND INTERLANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT IN SPEAKING : AN ANALYSIS OF ENGLISH DEPARTMENT STUDENTS’ SPOKEN LANGUAGE OF STKIP PGRI SUMATERA BARAT



yelfiza yelfiza(1*)

(1) STKIP PGRI Sumatera Barat
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Abstract

     This article is proposed to find out the development of interlanguage, especially the variability of the system the students use in speaking caused by linguistic markedness. Data were collected from participants when they performed their speech. The speech was recorded so that the writer can replay it after the research.

     The participants were chosen from those who were conssidered better students for the sake of practicality in collecting the data. The writer analyzed 3 speeches spoken by three participants. To study interlanguage development of the poor students is quite difficult, because they produce the language without the knowlege of English. Therefore, there is no fixed system found when they produce English.

Having collected the data and analyzed them, the writer found that interlanguage development is influenced by markedness. Markedness can be divided into marked and unmarked and it is one of the sources of difficulty. The students construct their own system of English based on the markedness they can identify. If they cannot see or listen to the markedness, they tend to make overgeneralization.

 


Keywords


Key words: markedness, interlanguage, development, and spoken language

Full Text:

PDF

References


References

Adamson. H.D. 2008. “Interlanguage variation in theoretical and pedagogical perspectiveâ€. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. London: Routledge.

Andersen, Roger W. 1984. “The One to One Principle of Interlanguage Constructionâ€. Language Lerning. Los angeles : Blackwell Publishers.

Angelis, Gessica De. 2005. “Interlanguage Transfer of Function Words.†Language Learning. Toronto: University of Toronto

Blevins, James P . 2000. “Markedness and Agreementâ€. University of Cmabridge. Transaction of the Philosophical Society. Volume 98: 2. 233-262.

Carlisle, Robert S. “The Modification of Onsets in a Markedness Relationship: Testing the Interlanguage Structural Conformity Hypothesis.†Language Learning California State University: Bakersfield l 47:2, June 1997, pp. 327–361

Eckman, Fred R. 1977. “Makedness and the Contrastive Analysis Hypothesis.†Language Learning Milwaukee: Wiley Blackwell

Ellis, Rod. 1994. The Study of Second Language Acquisition. An Introduction to the Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: OUP.

Huebner, Thorn. 1985. “System and variability in interlanguage Syntaxâ€. Language Learning Stanford : Wiley Blackwell Publishers.

Haskell, Todd, et al. 2011. “Linguistic Markedness and Category Learningâ€. Language and Cognitive Processes. Bellingham: (Taylor & Francis).

Larsen-Freeman, Diane and Lynne Cameron. 2008. Complex Systems and Applied Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Trawinski, Mariuzs. An Outline of SLA Theories. 2005. Krakao: Widawinictwo Naukowe Akademii Pedagogicznej.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2016 yelfiza yelfiza

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Curricula : Journal of Teaching and Learning has been covered by the following services:

Published by Lembaga Layanan Pendidikan Tinggi (LLDIKTI) Wilayah X

Khatib Sulaiman Street Padang, West Sumatera
Phone: +62751705637
Fax: +62751705637
Email: jurnal.lldikti10@ristekdikti.go.id

  Web Analytics View Curricula Stats