Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

The focus and scope of Curricula: Journal Teaching and Learning is scientific work in the form of research results in education, problems and educational issues and related topics as follows: (1) teacher professionalism, learning and teaching (2) vocational and entrepreneurial education (3) Inclusive Education (marginal and special needs) (4) school culture (5) curriculum development, assessment, creativity and educational innovation


Section Policies


Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Peer Review Process

Any manuscript submitted through an online process and reviewed by a partner will determine whether the manuscript is loaded or not in this journal. The reviewer for each submitted manuscript is 2 persons and has the appropriate knowledge or expertise. The review process conducted for 3 weeks. The reviewer's review is done by considering the track record of research that has been published at the national and international level.

Review of the Manuscript Process: Initial Review

  1. Read the abstract to make sure you have the expertise to review the article. Do not be afraid to say no to review the article if there is a good reason.
  2. Read the information provided by the journal for review so that you will know: a) Type of manuscript (for example, review articles, technical notes, original research) and journal expectations / parameters for that type of manuscript; B) Other journal requirements that the manuscripts must fulfill (eg, length, citation style).
  3. Know the scope and mission of the journal to ensure the topic of writing fits the scope.
  4. Ready? Read the entire manuscript at first to see if it is worth publishing - just make some notes about the main issues if they exist: a) Is the question of interest audible and significant? B) Is the design and / or method used adequate or fatal defects? (For original research paper); C) Is the result large enough to be considered for publication (or only two or more variables are presented or the result is so flawed that the paper can not be published)?
  5. What's the initial impression? If the paper is: a) Acceptable only with small comments / questions: solid, interesting, and new; Voice methodology used; The results are well presented; Discussions are well formulated with Interpretations based on logical reasoning, etc., with only a few comments / questions, turning to reviewing immediately; B) Severe disability so you have to reject it: move directly to write a review; C) Mixed somewhere in the range of "revision and resend" to "received with big changes" or you are not sure whether to reject it or not: It may be a decent paper, but there are major issues that need to be resolved


Publication Frequency

Curricula is a journal published three times a year (April, August, December). The journal focuses on publishing unpublished original research results anywhere in teaching and learning, curriculum development and development, assessment and measurement, and educational creativity and innovation. While issues in education include teacher professionalism, learning and teaching, vocational and entrepreneurship education, inclusion education and school culture. 


Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.



This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system between participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More ...


Plagiarism Policy

All manuscripts / articles submitted to Curricula  will be checked plagiarism by editorial team using Plagramme and Plagiarism Checker X