THE EFFECT OF SCORE STRATEGY AND READING MOTIVATION TOWARD STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION OF NARRATIVE TEXTS AT GRADE X SMA NEGERI 2 PADANG



Willy Satria(1*)

(1) STKIP PGRI Sumatera Barat
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This research was quasi experimental research with factorial 2x2 design. Population of the research was grade X students with the total population was 224. The sample was taken by using cluster random sampling, class MIA 2 as experimental group and class MIA 3 as the control group. To collect the data, the researcher used reading comprehension test while questionnaire was used to collect the data about students’ reading motivation. Then, the collected data were analyzed by Chi-Square for normality data testing, variance test for homogeneity data testing, t-test formula and ANOVA for hypothesis testing.

            The analysis of the research reveals that: (1) students who are taught by SCORE strategy get better reading comprehension on narrative text  than the students who are taught by Guided Reading strategy, (2) the students with high reading motivation who are taught by SCORE strategy do not get better reading comprehension on narrative text than who are taught by using Guided Reading strategy, (3) the students with low reading motivation who are taught by SCORE strategy get better reading comprehension on narrative text than who are taught by using Guided Reading strategy, (4) there is no interaction between both strategies and students’ reading motivation toward their reading comprehension on narrative text. In conclusion, SCORE strategy is an effective way on students’ reading comprehension compared with Guided Reading. It is suggested for the students that have high and low reading motivation to improve their skill in language learning through SCORE strategy.

Keywords


Soc

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2006. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta

Bachman, Lyle F. 1990. Fundamental Considerations in Language Testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Brown, H. Douglas. 2001. Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy. New York: Longman.

Brummit, Joelle. 2008. What is Reading Comprehension?.Retrieved on May 14th 2014 from http://www.k12reader.com/what-is-reading-comprehension.

Creswell, John B. 2008. Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. New Jersey: Pearson Education.

Darewianka, B. 1990. Exploring How Text Work. Sidney: Primary English Teaching Association.

Donnelly, P. 2007. Inking Your Thinking: The Ultimate Meaning Making Strategy. Literacy Learning: the Middle Years, Vol 1, No 1 February.

Dubbin, Fraida, et al. 1986. Teaching Second Language Reading For Acquisition Purposes. Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company. Inc

Duffy, Gerald G. 2009. Explaining Reading: a Resource for Teaching Concepts, Skills and Strategies. New York: the Guilford Press.

Fogarty, R. 1999. How to raise test scores: USA: SkyLight Professional Development.

Gallety, Susan. 2010. SCORE the Coach Approach to Deman Reading, Retrieved on October 2013 from http://www.learningplace.com.au/sc/cg/literacy

Gambrell, L. B., J. A. Malloy, and S. A. Mazzoni. 2007. Evidence- Based Best Practice for Comprehensive Literacy Instruction. Retrieved on January 27th 2014 from http://www.indiana.edu/-safeschl

Gay, L. R. and P. Airisian. 2000. Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Application. New York: Prentice Hall.inc.

Gay, L. R. and P. Airisian. 2009. Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Application. New York: Prentice Hall.inc.

Gay, L.R, G. E. Mills, P. Airisian. 2011. Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Application. New York: Prentice Hall.inc.

Griffiths, Carol. 2008. Lesson from Good Language Learners. Edited Book. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Guthrie, T., W. Laurel, M. Stephen, M. Nicole, and L. Erin. 2006. Reading Motivation and Reading Comprehension Growth in the Later Elementary Years. Maryland: University of Maryland College Park.

Hamilton, Sue et. al. 2010. SCORE the Coach Approach to Demand Reading. Volume 8 number 13. Retrieved on October 2013 from http://www.alea.edu.au/documents/item/79.

Harris, A. J. 1990. How to Increase Reading Ability: A Guide to Development and Remedial Methods. New York: David Mckey.

Hirsch, E.D. (2003). Reading Comprehension Requires Knowledge – of Words and the world. American Educator, American Federation of Teachers (Spring).

Irwin, Judith Westphal. 2000. Teaching Reading Comprehension Process. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Inc.

Jamestown. 2006. Motivation and Engagement: Interactive Educational System. New York: Mcgraaw- Hill

Johns, C. 2009. Making Their Mark. Paper presented at the ALEA ‘Literacy Heaven’ session: Mackay, Queensland: 4 April 2009.

Labov, W., & Waletzky, J. 1967. Narrative Analysis: Oral Version of Personal Experience. In J. Helm(ed.), Essays on the Verbal and Visual Arts: Proceedings of the 1996 Annual Spring Meeting of the American Ethnological Society (pp . 12-44). Seattle: University of Washington Press.

Pallinscar, A. S., Ann. L. B. 1984. Reciprocal Teaching of Comprehension-Fostering and Comprehension-Monitoring Activities.

Pressley, M. 2006. What the Future of Reading Research could be. Paper presented at the International Reading Association’s Reading Research 2006. Chicago. April 29, 2006.


Refbacks



Copyright (c) 2016 Willy Satria

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Curricula : Journal of Teaching and Learning has been covered by the following services:

Published by Lembaga Layanan Pendidikan Tinggi (LLDIKTI) Wilayah X

Khatib Sulaiman Street Padang, West Sumatera
Phone: +62751705637
Fax: +62751705637
Email: jurnal.lldikti10@ristekdikti.go.id

  Web Analytics View Curricula Stats