Parate Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia : Urgensi dan Rekonstruksi Hukum Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019

Ageng Triganda Sayuti; Yenni Erwita; Lili Naili Hidayah

doi:10.22216/soumlaw.v3i2.5519

Parate Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia : Urgensi dan Rekonstruksi Hukum Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019

http://doi.org/10.22216/soumlaw.v3i2.5519

Ageng Triganda Sayuti^(1*), Yenni Erwita⁽²⁾, Lili Naili Hidayah⁽³⁾

(1) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Jambi
(2) Universitas Jambi
(3) Universitas Jambi
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

The different motives of the creditor and the debtors caused the different understanding of the parate execution. This is due to the regulation of parate execution in Fiducia Guarantee Law (UUJF) regarding to the implementation mechanism for the execution is not regulated clearly and in detail, so that in practice there are many legal problems for the fiducia guarantee execution. Until then, the execution of the fiducia guarantee problem up to the trial at the Constitutional Court of the article 15 (2) (3) UUJF related to the parate execution, then later in its decision the Constitutional Court declared the article is conditionally unconstitutional. This article aims to determine the urgency of the parate execution in fiducia guarantees and the need for amendment (reconstruction) of the UUJF that regulates the new concept of the parate execution which is more guarantee the creation of legal certainty and the fulfillment of the just law. This article is the result from normative juridical research wherein the approach of the problem is carried related to the provisons of the parate execution. This results of this research shows the important existence of the parate execution in the execution of the fiducia guarantee on the grounds of the legal certainty, effectivity and efficiency in the execution, as well as the reason for the investment climate so that a legal reconstruction is needed to provides legal certainty for the execution process of the fiducia guarantee with consideration of fast time and low cost.

Keywords

Parate Execution, Urgency, Reconstruction.

Full Text:

PDF (Indonesian)

References

Alfi, A. N. (2018). Pendaftaran Sertifikat Jaminan Fidusia Meningkat. Bisnis.Com. https://finansial.bisnis.com/read/20180909/215/836598/pendaftaran-sertifikat-jaminan-fidusia-meningkat

Ali, A. (2002). Keterpurukan Hukum di Indonesia Penyebab dan Solusinya. Ghalia Indonesia,.

Alizon, J. (2020). Rekonstruksi Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/Puu-Xvii/2019. 2(1), 58â€“82.

Anggoro, T. (2007). Parate Eksekusi: Hak Kreditur, Yang Menderogasi Hukum Formil (Suatu Pemahaman Dasar Dan Mendalam). Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 37(4), 535. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol37.no4.160

Arifin, Z. (2016). Rekonstruksi Parate Eksekusi Hak Tanggungan Atas Tanah Yang Berbasis Nilai Keadilan. Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum, 3(2), 191. https://doi.org/10.26532/jph.v3i2.1439

Atmadja, M. K. (1975). Pembinaan Hukum dalam Rangka Pembangunan Nasional. Lemabaga Penelitian Hukum dan Kriinologi Fakultas Hukum Universitas Padjajaran & Penerbit Binacipta.

Badan Koordinasi Penanaman Modal. (2018). Ease of Doing Business di Indonesia Terus Membaik. Investindonesia.Go.Id. https://www.investindonesia.go.id/id/artikel-investasi/detail/ease-of-doing-business-di-indonesia-terus-membaik

Dinata, A. W. (2020). Lembaga Jaminan Fidusia: Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019. Nagari Law Review, 3(2), 84. https://doi.org/10.25077/nalrev.v.3.i.2.p.84-99.2020

ERH. (2016). Inovasi Fidusia dan Notaris Online Sumbang PNBP RP 34 Triliun. Berita Satu. https://www.beritasatu.com/nasional/355378-inovasi-fidusia-dan-notaris-online-sumbang-pnbp-rp-34-triliun

Fuadi, M. (2003). Jaminan Fidusia. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Hudiyanto, Situmorang, R. L., Prasetyo, A., & Bari, R. F. (2018). Kajian Perlindungan Konsumen di Sektor Jasa Keuangan Penguatan Perlindungan Konsumen Dalam Penggunaan Jaminan Fidusia (p. 50). Otoritas Jasa Keuangan.

Huzaini, M. D. P. (2019a). Butuh Aturan Lebih Detail, Parate Eksekusi Bermanfaat Dalam Sistem Jaminan. Hukum Online. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/baca/lt5ce0bc2dc9da8/butuh-aturan-lebih-detil--parate-e

Huzaini, M. D. P. (2019b). Butuh Aturan Lebih Detail, Parate Eksekusi Bermanfaat Dalam Sistem Jaminan. Hukum Online. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/baca/lt5ce0bc2dc9da8/butuh-aturan-lebih-detil--parate-eksekusi-bermanfaat-dalam-sistem-jaminan?page=all

Isra, S. (2010). Negative Legislator. Saldiisra. https://www.saldiisra.web.id/index.php/21-makalah/makalah1/302-negative-legislator.html#jb

Putusan Mahkamah Konsittusi Nomor 18/ PUU â€“ XVII/2019, Pub. L. No. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/ PUU â€“ XVII/2019 (2019).

Marzuki, P. M. (2008). Penelitian Hukum. Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Nurwitasari, H. D. (2014). Problematika Berbagai Peraturan Eksekusi Objek Jaminan Fidusia. Jurnal Hukum & Penelitian Bidang Keperdataan Dan Kenotariatan.

Kitab Undang Undang Hukum Perdata.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 42 Tahun 1999 Tentang Jaminan Fidusia, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 3889, 1 (1999).

Qurâ€™ani, H. (2018). Ini PR Besar Revisi UU Jaminan Fidusia. Hukum Online. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/baca/lt5bf2b248083bc/ini-pr-besar-revisi-uu-jaminan-fidusia/

Rahardjo, S. (2014). Ilmu Hukum (kedelapan). Citra Aditya Bakti.

Salami, R. U., & Bintoro, R. W. (2008). Aletrnatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Dalam Sengketa Transaksi Elektronik (E-Commerce). Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 2(4), 124â€“135.

Salim, H. (2004). Perkembangan Hukum Jaminan di Indonesia. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Satrio, J. (2002). Hukum Jaminan Hak Jaminan Kebendaan Fidusia. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Suraji, S., & Mugiyati, M. (2007). Penelitian Hukum Tentang Perkembangan Lembaga Jaminan di Indonesia. Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional Departemen Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Republik Indonesia.

Suryoutomo, M., Hendroyono, A., & Maryam, S. (2014). Implementasi Model Parate Executie Atas Jaminan Fidusia: (Uji Model Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia). Implementasi Model Parate Executie Atas Jaminan Fidusia: (Uji Model Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia), 43(4), 497â€“504. https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.43.4.2014.497-504

Usman, R. (2008). Hukum Jaminan Keperdataan. Sinar Grafika.

Wicaksana, P. (2020). MK Keluarkan Putusan Baru Mengenai Jaminan Fidusia, Berikut Penjelasan Guru Besar FH Unair. Universitas Airlangga.

Yusuf, T. (2019). Modal Perusahaan â€œLeasingâ€ Lonceng Kematian MF Lokal.