Kelemahan Pertimbangan Hakim Terhadap Putusan Sengketa Perdata Saat Ini



Pandu Dewanto(1*)

(1) Hakim pada Pengadilan Negeri Demak
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Weaknesses of the Legal Substance, in fact, that the legal discovery is not just applying existing legal rules and regulations, but then trying to create its own law if the legal rules are unclear, not strict or the legal regulations do not exist. The research method of this article is normative legal research and empirical legal research. This article explains that the Judge has not been able to consider all aspects of the parties so that when the judge makes a decision, the defeated party becomes more and more defeated because the decision of the losing party is often punished too high and burdensome by granting the request of the winning party. Judging from the weaknesses of the legal culture, that seniority still determines the career and rank of a judge, so that sometimes a progressive judge is slightly constrained in exploring his ability to think when in a trial or make a decision. The judge must be able to consider all aspects of both the Plaintiff and Defendant's sides so that when the judge renders a decision, the losing party does not feel very defeated.

Keywords


Kelemahan, Pertimbangan Hakim, Putusan Sengketa Perdata

Full Text:

PDF (Indonesian)

References


Arliman, Laurensius. 2017. “Hukum Pidana Sebagai Landasan Penegakan Hukum Oleh Penegak Hukum Di Indonesia.” Jendela Hukum dan Keadilan 4(2).

———. 2018. “Peranan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Di Dalam Perkembangan Ilmu Hukum Di Indonesia.” Soumatera Law Review 1(1).

Artadi, Ibnu. 2016. “Hukum: Antara Nilai-Nilai Kepastian, Kemanfaatan Dan Keadilan.” Hukum dan Dinamika Masyarakat 7(1).

Asshiddiqie, Jimly. 2006. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Tata Negara. Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia.

Bertens, Kees. 2002. Filsafat Barat Kontemporer Inggris, Jerman. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Bix, Brian H. 2006. Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory. Marden: Blackwell Publishing.

Butarbutar, E. Nurhaini. 2012. “Antinomi Dalam Penerapan Asas Legalitas Dalam Proses Penemuan Hukum.” Yustisia Jurnal Hukum 1(1).

Fattah, Damanhuri. 2013. “Teori Keadilan Menurut John Rawls.” Jurnal TAPIs 9(2).

Hamdan. 2010. “Jenis-Jenis Putusan Hakim Dalam Perkara Pidana (Suatu Catatan Tentang Pembaruan Kuhap).” Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan 40(4).

HM. Soerya Respationo, M. Guntur Hamzah. “Putusan Hakim: Menuju Rasionalitas Hukum Refleksif Dalam Penegakan Hukum.” 2(2).

Ibnu Subarkah, Lukman Hakim. 2015. “Penanggulangan Campur Tangan Urusan Peradilan Di Luar Kekuasaan Kehakiman Berbasis Penal Reform (Studi Di Wilayah Hukum Pengadilan Tinggi Jawa Timur).” Yustisia Jurnal Hukum 4(2).

Manan, Bagir. 2004. Sistem Peradilan Berwibawa (Suatu Pencarian). Jakarta: FH-UI Press.

Mulyadi, Lilik. 2013. “Mediasi Penal Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia: Pengkajian Asas, Norma, Teori Dan Praktik.” Yustisia Jurnal Hukum 2(1).

Murphy, James Bernard. 2005. The Philosophy of Positive Law : Foundations of Jurisprudence. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Nurjaya, I Nyoman. 2014. “Penalaran Hakim Dalam Menciptakan Hukum (Judge-Made-Law) ; Suatu Kegiatan Berpikir Ilmiah.” Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan 13(4).

Retno, Maria Emelia. 2007. “Kontradiksi Antara Wajib Pajak Mendapatkan Keadilan.” Jurnal Pro Justitia 25(3).

Ridwan. 2009. “Memunculkan Karakter Hukum Progresif Dari Asas Asas Umum Pemerintahan Yang Baik Solusi Pencarian Dan Penemuan Keadilan Substantif.” Jurnal Pro J 27(1).

Setyanegara, Ery. 2014. “Kebebasan Hakim Memutus Perkara Dalam Konteks Pancasila (Ditinjau Dari Keadilan ‘Substantif’).” Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan 44(4).

Siahaan, Lintong Oloan. 2007. “Peran Hakim Dalam Pembaruan Hukum Di Indonesia Hal-Hal Yang Harus Diketahui (Proses Berfikir) Hakim Agar Dapat Menghasilkan Putusan Yang Berkualitas.” Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan37(3).

Soehartono. 2014. “Mengembangkan Pemikiran Hakim Dalam Menyelesaikan Sengketa.” Yustisia Jurnal Hukum 13(1).

Soetoprawiro, Koerniatmanto. 2010. “Keadilan Sebagai Keadilan.” Jurnal Pro Justitia 28(2).

Ujan, Andre Ata. 2009. Filsafat Hukum: Membangun Hukum, Membela Keadilan. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.

Yudisial, Komisi. 2017. Problematika Hakim Dalam Ranah Hukum, Pengadilan, Dan Masyarakat Di Indonesia: Studi Sosio-Legal. Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Pandu Dewanto

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

ISSN: 2620-5904

Web Analytics View My Stats