Narasi Tunggal (Grand Narrative) Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Tindak Pidana Korupsi Suatu Keterlemparan Dalam Simulacra



Rocky Marbun(1*)

(1) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pancasila, Jakarta
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


A phenomenon in the modern era, where myths are only directed to one goal, which is to maintain a grand narrative (single narrative). The grand narrative is a scientific objective construction without disputes there and is the only standard parameter for every social problem. One grand narrative which is a myth of modernity is that every legal attempt by a convicted corruption is a fight against justice. Thus, there is a postulate that every filing of legal remedies will be further aggravated criminal punishment. Thus, the law enforcement process is built in a scientific-rational-logical-systematic way based on teleological absolutism. So, in this study, the researcher proposes the formulation of the problem, namely, how does the work of myths which are preserved as grand narratives in modernity in the criminal justice process against corrupt behavior? This research uses a normative juridical method based on secondary data through a literature study, which is equipped with various research approaches, including philosophical and linguistic approaches. The results of this study are to show that one narrative is retained as a myth of modernity through the work of Legal Studies that rebuilt Defendants in proposing legal remedies as something that must be made worse by the threat of criminal sanctions.

Keywords


Corruption, Critics, Law Enforcement, Criminal, Simulacra

Full Text:

PDF (Indonesian)

References


Anggraeni, Ricca. 2011. “Pengusungan Pola Pikir Positivisme Hukum Dalam Perkara Korupsi.” Jurnal Yudisial 4(3).

Benny H. Hoed. 2014. Semiotika Dan Dinamika Sosial Budaya. Depok.

Desmon, Andi. 2018. “Penafsiran Konstitusi Dalam Bingkai Hukum Pancasila.” Jurnal Cendekia Hukum 3(2).

Dimyati, Khudzaifah. 2004. Ilmu Hukum: Pencarian Pembebasan Dan Pencerahan. Surakarta: Muhammadiyah Univesity Press.

Encung. 2012. “Tradisi Dan Modernitas Perspektif Seyyed Hossein Nasr.” Teosofi: Jurnal Tasawuf dan Pemikiran Islam2(1).

Fitzerald Kennedy Sitorus. 2010. Filsafat Kritisisme Kant: Dari Subjek Yang Kosong Hingga Tuhan Sebagai Postula. Jakarta.

Hidayat, Medhy Aginta. 2019. “Menimbang Teori-Teori Sosial Postmodern: Sejarah, Pemikiran, Kritik Dan Masa Depan Postmodernisme.” Journal of Urban Sociology 2(1).

Huda, Chairul. 2011. “Pola Pemberatan Pidana Dalam Hukum Pidana Khusus.” Jurnal Hukum 18(4).

Huda, Ni’matul. 2005. Negara Hukum, Demokrasi & Judicial Review. Yogyakarta: UII Press.

Ibrahim, Johnny. 2012. “Teori Dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif.”

Indonesia Corruption Watch. 2020. “Catatan Pemantauan Perkara Korupsi Yang Divonis Oleh Pengadilan Selama Tahun 2013: Hukuman Koruptor Belum Menjerakan.” https://www.antikorupsi.org/sites/default/files/files/Berita/Laporan_Pemantauan_Tren_Vonis_Pengadilan_2013.pdf (March 25, 2020).

Johan Setiawan, Ajat Sudrajat. 2018. “Pemikiran Postmodernisme Dan Pandangannya Terhadap Ilmu Pengetahuan.” Jurnal Filsafat 28(1).

John Lechte. 2001. 50 Filsuf Kontemporer. Dari Strukturalisme Sampai Postmodernistas. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.

Kelsen, Hans. 2007a. General Theory Of Law And State. Jakarta: Bee Media Indonesia.

———. 2007b. Pure Theory of Law. Bandung: Nuansa dan Nusamedia. https://m.riaupos.co/208650-berita-pb-djarum-tolak-intervensi.html.

M.C.J, Stoddart. 2007. “Ideology, Hegemony, Discourse: A Critical Review of Theories of Knowledge and Power.” Social Thought & Research 28.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. 2008. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Max Horkeimer, Theodor W. Adorno. 2014. “Dialektika Pencerahan. Mencari Identitas Manusia Rasional.”

Online, Hukum. 2020. “PK Tanpa Banding Dan Kasasi Tak Boleh Diterima.” https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/baca/lt4cbf58cb3f1de/pk-tanpa-banding-dan-kasasi-tak-boleh-diterima/ (March 30, 2020).

Philipus M. Hadjon, Tatiek Sri Djatmiati. 2005. Argumentasi Hukum (Legal Argumentation/Legal Reasoning), Langkah-Langkah Legal Problem Solving Dan Penyusunan Legal Opinion. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.

Piliang, Yasraf Amir. 2001. “Posmodernisme Dan Ekstasi Komunikasi.” Jurnal Komunikasi Mediator 2(2).

Putro, Widodo. 2011. “Tinjauan Kritis Filosofis Terhadap Paradigma Postivisme Hukum.” Universitas Indonesia.

Putro, Widodo Dwi. 2011. Kritik Terhadap Paradigma Positivisme Hukum. Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing.

Sidharta, Bernard Arief. 2008. Struktur Ilmu Hukum Indonesia. Bandung: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Katolik Parahyangan.

Stephen W. Littlejohn, Karen A. Foss. 2011. Teori Komunikasi. Jakarta: Salemba Humanika.

Sumaryono, E. 20099. Hermeneutik. Sebuah Metode Filsafat. 2nd ed. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.

Suriasumantri, Jujun S. 2006. Ilmu Dalam Perspektif: Sebuah Kumpulan Karangan Tentang Hakekat Ilm. ed. 2. Jakarta: Gramedia.

Vera, Nawiroh. 2014. Semiotika Dalam Riset Komunikasi. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.

Wahid, Edy Chandra dan Umaimah. 2013. “Budaya Populer Dan Simulacra Kawula Muda Jakarta Dalam Penggunaan Situs Video Youtube (Kasus Unggah Video Gamaliel-Audrey Dan Sinta-Jojo),.” Jurnal Sosiohumaniora 15(2).

Wahjono, Padmo. 2020. Indonesai Negara Berdasarkan Atas Hukum. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.

Yuntho, Emerson. 2016. “Eksaminasi Terhadap Putusan Pengadilan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Pada Pengadilan Negeri Kelas IA Khusus Bandung Atas Nama Terdakwa Rachmat Yasin.” Jurnal Integritas 2(1).

Zaman, Arpan. 2018. “Usaha-Usaha Memasyarakatkan Hukum Di Dalam Masyarakat.” Jurnal Cendikia Hukum 3(2).


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Rocky Marbun

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

ISSN: 2620-5904

Web Analytics View My Stats