RELEVANSI PRESIDENTIAL THRESHOLD DENGAN PRINSIP KEDAULATAN RAKYAT

http://doi.org/10.22216/soumlaw.v1i2.3712


Andi Desmon(1*)

(1) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Ekasakti
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


As a means of implementing popular sovereignty, general elections have become a sort of agenda for modern state routines within a certain period of time to distribute power. Constitutionally, the implementation of general elections has been regulated in the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. The Presidential threshold is the concept of proposing presidential and vice presidential candidates. This proposal is carried out by political parties or joint political parties in election elections. Political parties or joint political parties are responsible for the proposed pair of presidents and vice presidents. This paper uses normative juridical research. General elections are the implementation of the principle of popular sovereignty. One of the principles of popular sovereignty is the recognition of the majority of the voice of sovereignty and giving respect to the voice of minorities by providing equal opportunities and benefits to achieve equality and justice. Therefore the implementation of the presidential threshold is not relevant to the principle of popular sovereignty, because it does not give respect to political parties that get a minority vote by providing equal opportunities and benefits to achieve equality and justice.

Keywords


People's Sovereignty, General Election, Presidential Threshold

Full Text:

PDF (Indonesian)

References


(Ed), S. I. dan S. (2009). Metode Penelitian Hukum: Konstelasi dan Refleksi. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.

Al, N. M. et. (2004). Naning Mardiniah et. al, Memperkuat Posisi Politik Rakyat Panduan Pendidikan Pemilih Pemilu 2004 , C. Jakarta: ESDA-LP3ES.

Asshiddiqie, J. (2007). Pokok-pokok Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia Pasca Reformasi ,. Jakarta: Bhuana Ilmu Populer.

Fatah, E. S. (1998). Catatan Atas Gagalnya Politik Orde Baru. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Ghoffar, A. (2009). Perbandingan Kekuasaan Presiden Indonesia Setelah Perubahan UUD 1945 dengan Delapan Negara Maju, 2009.

Hartono. (2000). Hartono, Sejarah Presiden di Indonesia. Jakarta: Fusindo Grafika.

Jazim Hamidi. (2010). Hukum Lembaga Kepresidenan Indonesia. Bandung: PT Alumni.

Larensius Arliman S. (2018). Pemakzulan Presiden Dan Wakil Presiden Di Indonesia, Jurnal Justicia et Pax, Volume 34, Nomor 1, 2018, hlm. 1-14. Jurnal Justicia et Pax,34(1), 1–14.

Manan, B. (1996). Kedaulatan Rakyat, Hak Asasi Manusia, dan Negara Hukum, Kumpulan Esai guna menghormati Sri Soemantri Martosoewignjo, Gaya Media Pratama, Jakarta, 1996, hlm 56.

Marnudji, S. S. dan S. (1990). Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Jakarta: Rajawali.

Marzuki, P. M. (2017). Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana.

MD, M. M. (2010). Konstitusi dan Hukum dalam Kontroversi Isu,. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Natsir, M. (2009). Alasan yang Melanggar Prinsip Demokrasi, Dalam Kholid O. Santoso (Ed), Mencari Demokrasi Gagasan dan Pemikiran. Bandung: Sega Arsy.

Nurtjahjo, H. (2006). Filsafat Demokrasi. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

S, L. A. (2016). Lembaga-Lembaga Negara Di Dalam Undang-Undang Dasar 1945. Yogyakarta: Deepublish.

S, L. A. (2017). Hak Atas Pengadaan Dan Standar Rumah Bagi Mantan Presiden Dan/Atau Wakil Presiden Republik Indonesia. Jurnal Yuridis, 4(1), 46–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2010.02280.x

Soehino. (1993). Hukum Tatanegara Sistem Pemerintahan Negara,. Yogyakarta: Liberty.

Sulardi. (2012). Menuju Sistem Pemerintahan Presidensiil Murni,. Semarang: Setara Press.

Suny, I. (1986). Pergeseran Kekuasaan Eksekutif. Jakarta: Aksara Baru.

Titik Triwulan Tutik. (2010). Konstruksi Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia Pasca Amandemen UUD 1945. Jakarta: Kencana.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Andi Desmon

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

ISSN: 2620-5904

Web Analytics View My Stats