PERANAN METODOLOGI PENELITIAN HUKUM DI DALAM PERKEMBANGAN ILMU HUKUM DI INDONESIA

http://doi.org/10.22216/soumlaw.v1i1.3346


Laurensius Arliman S(1*)

(1) Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Padang
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Research as a scientific activity is part of the process of developing science and human intelligence. Legal science as a branch of science is bound to the paradigm that occurs in science in general. The paradigm of jurisprudence shows its own peculiarity, in its development showing an unbroken, paradigmatic development but sustainable. It is necessary to realize that the science of law is a very complex science, ranging from philosophical studies, the development of both theoretical and practical scholarship, to the concrete form of eksistesinya which is not dedicated to the community. One way to find out the development of legal research methodology is to trace the thinking path of legal research methodology can be divided into two fundamental things: Jurisprudential Model and Sociological Model. Through legal research will be useful in the development of law in Indonesia, to see the research topic it will be easy to determine the background of problems, problem formulation, problem objectives, research authenticity, research benefits, legal theories to be used, conceptual framework, research methodology, systemetics of writing, and literature review of the research.


Keywords


Legal Research Methodology; Development; Legal studies; Indonesia.

Full Text:

PDF (Indonesian)

References


Amiruddin. (2012). Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: PT. RajaGrafindo Persada. Anwar, K. (2013). Peranan Filsafat Ilmu Dalam Pengembagan Ilmu Hukum. Fiat Justisia Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.24239/jsi.v8i1.84.53-80

Asmara, T. (2003). Penelitian Budaya Hukum : Konsep dan Metodologi, (1), 445–452. Carey, S. S. (2015). Kaidah-Kaidah Metode Ilmiah Panduan unrtuk Penelitian dan Critical Thinking.pdf. Bandung: Nusa Media.

Hadisuprapto, P. (2009). Ilmu Hukum (Pendekatan Kajiannya). Jambi. Joeni Arianto Kurniawan. (2012). Pluralisme Hukum dan Urgensi Kajian Socio-Legal menuju Studi dan Pengembangan Hukum yang Berkeadilan Sosial.

Yuridika, 27(1), 17–34. Kamis, M. (2004). Gagasan Negara Hukum yang Demokratis Di Indonesia (Studi Sosio Legal Atas Pembatasan Kekuasaan Presiden Oleh MPR 1999-2002). Universitas Indonesia. Mahdi, I. (2016). Ilmu Hukum dan Perkembangannya (Kajian Khusus Hukum Normatif). Nuansa, IX(2), 107–117.

Marzuki, P. M. (2001). Penelitian Hukum. Jurnal Yuridika, 16(1), 2001.

Marzuki, P. M. (2007). Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana. Marzuki, P. M. (2008). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana.

Muhdlor, A. Z. (2012). Perkembangan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum. Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 1(2).

Mukti Fajar ND, Y. A. (2013). Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Empiris.pdf. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Philipus M. Hadjon, T. S. D. (2005). Argumentasi Hukum. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.

Purwaka, T. H. (2011). Penafsiran, Penalaran, dan Argumentasi Hukum yang Sasional. Masalah - Masalah Hukum, 40(2).

Putro, W. (2011). Tinjauan Kritis Filosofis Terhadap Paradigma Postivisme Hukum. Universitas Indonesia. Sonata, D. L. (2014).

Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif Dan Empiris: Karakteristik Khas Dari Metode Meneliti Hukum. Fiat Justisia JJurnal Ilmu Hukum, 8(1), 15–35. Susanto, A. F. (2010). lmu Hukum Non Sistematik: Fondasi Filsafat Pengembangan Ilmu Hukum Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing.

Tutik, T. T. (2014). Ilmu Hukum, Hakekat Keilmuannya Ditinjau Dari Sudut Filsafat Ilmu Dan Teori Ilmu Hukum. Jurnal Hukum Dan Pembangunan, 44(2).

Yudisial, K. (2015). Mengagas Peradilan Etik Di Indonesi. Jakarta: Komisi Yudisial. Yusuf, A. M. (2010). Metode Penelitian, Dasar-Dasar Penyelidikan Ilmiah. Padang: UNP Press.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Soumatera Law Review

ISSN: 2620-5904

Web Analytics View My Stats